Sullivan County discusses special zoning and possible moratorium for data centers amid energy and infrastructure concerns

Sullivan County Commission · November 14, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners heard an informational briefing that data centers can be energy- and water-intensive and that the planning department is drafting a P&D-3 (plant/manufacturing) district; staff and commissioners favored a time-limited moratorium while zoning and infrastructure requirements are written.

Commissioners set aside time on Nov. 13 to discuss potential county policy for data centers after a request that staff provide background ahead of expected action next week.

Clay Reid, appearing as a planning/administration guest, said data centers and related operations (including some cryptocurrency mining and AI facilities) are high-demand energy users and will remain part of modern infrastructure; he summarized research suggesting the sector could account for roughly 7–9% of U.S. grid demand by 2030. Reid recommended creating a P&D-3 (plant/manufacturing) district that would locate data centers in industrial parks with transitional buffering from residential areas.

Commissioners asked practical questions about distinctions between crypto mining and conventional data centers, employment, and tax effects. Reid said employment per project varies; some data-mining installations employ only a few people while larger data centers can employ dozens to low hundreds. He offered a hypothetical facility profile: a 400,000-square-foot campus, roughly $125 million in real property value, and an illustrative estimate of roughly $800,000 in annual property tax revenue on the real property in early years before depreciation adjustments.

Commissioners and staff discussed infrastructure constraints, noting the Tennessee Valley Authority would evaluate power-supply decisions and that few county sites have the ready infrastructure for large facilities. Several commissioners supported a temporary, time-limited moratorium (six to nine months suggested) to allow the county to finish zoning language and coordinate with utility partners without permanently closing the door to projects.

The commission did not adopt a moratorium on Nov. 13; staff indicated they are preparing draft zoning that would direct data centers to industrial locations and address buffers, noise and other community impacts for future consideration.