Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Circuit Breaker topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Maui committee expands circuit-breaker tax credit, clarifies eligibility
Summary
The Special Committee on Real Property Tax Reform approved Bill 170 on first reading to create an expanded circuit-breaker tax credit for long‑time Maui homeowners, raising the cap to $10,000 and clarifying that the 15-of-20-year home‑exemption requirement applies to the same property. Members argued for retaining a building‑value test to avoid rewarding intentional tax‑planning.
A Maui County committee voted to advance a new circuit‑breaker tax credit aimed at long‑time homeowners facing sharply higher property assessments.
The Special Committee on Real Property Tax Reform on Nov. 13 recommended first reading of Bill 170, which would create an additional circuit‑breaker category for homeowners who have been granted a home exemption on the same property for at least 15 of the prior 20 tax years and would raise the credit cap to $10,000 (from $8,200). "This is an additional circuit breaker to address generational families whose building values have risen," Director of Finance Marcy Martin said.
Why it matters: Committee members said rising building values have pushed some long‑time owners into unaffordable tax bills even though they have limited income or equity. The bill targets owners with longstanding ties to a property rather than recent buyers or owners who built high‑value homes and then sought the credit.
What was discussed: Members and testifiers debated whether to keep a building‑value criterion that excludes owners who have constructed expensive homes and thereby driven up their own taxes. Public commenter Tom Crowley urged the committee to consider removing the building‑value test entirely, saying the original policy objective was to help owners bearing high land value increases rather than owners who built expensive structures. Finance said the building‑value criterion offers a safeguard against opportunistic claims but acknowledged it can complicate assessments because building and land values were once combined in the county system.
Amendment and vote: Corporation Counsel advised clarifying language so the 15‑of‑20‑year homeowner requirement applies to the property receiving the credit. Member Gabe Johnson offered the friendly amendment and Member Sugimura seconded. The committee approved the bill as amended on a voice/hand vote: 3 ayes, 0 noes, 1 excused (Member Rollins Fernandez).
Next steps: The bill now moves toward formal council consideration for subsequent readings. Finance estimated a modest revenue impact — roughly 300 properties are currently on a circuit‑breaker program — but said the targeted relief could make a substantial difference for qualifying homeowners.
