Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Critical Areas topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Everett planners brief committee on critical‑areas rewrite, propose larger stream buffers and clearer rules
Summary
Planning staff told the committee the city is revising critical‑areas regulations to reflect updated science, reorganize code for readability, and increase some stream buffers (Type N) toward roughly 100 feet; staff said impacts are site‑specific and a Planning Commission briefing is penciled in for Dec. 3.
Planning staff briefed the Parks and Built Environment Committee that the city is undertaking a periodic update of its critical‑areas regulations to incorporate best available science and improve code organization and clarity.
Staff said the rewrite reorganizes the chapter into articles to make it easier to read and apply, and that staff do not expect the changes to be substantively more restrictive in most locations. ‘‘A lot of it is just updating definitions, updating kind of model code language that many jurisdictions use and aligning that and improving readability,’’ the planner said.
On substantive technical changes, staff described increases to stream buffers for small (Type N) streams toward a roughly 100‑foot standard in many cases. They emphasized that critical‑areas impacts remain highly site‑specific: biologists and geologists evaluate a site’s functions and values and buffers can be averaged, mitigated, or restored in tradeoffs for limited development. Staff said they are drafting an environmental checklist and summary to explain practical impacts but that precise effects are often determined at project review.
The planner said outreach is under way to stakeholders, including the Tulalip Tribes and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and that the Planning Commission is scheduled for an initial briefing on Dec. 3. Staff indicated that if the commission completes its work on critical areas quickly, the manufactured‑housing item may wait until January for its planning‑commission review.
No formal decisions were made at the Nov. 12 briefing; staff will bring a proposed package to the Planning Commission and return with any recommended revisions.
