Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Allcove Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palo Alto officials urge county to preserve Allcove youth center amid proposed cuts
Summary
City and school district liaison committee members on Nov. 13 warned that proposed county budget cuts could force Allcove—an accessible youth mental-health center—into a nonprofit transition or closure, and they urged a unified city–district message asking the county to fund a $2 million annual transition while local partners seek gap funding.
City and school district liaison committee members said on Nov. 13 that Allcove, a county-run youth mental-health center serving ages 12–25, faces an uncertain future after county staff proposed reducing direct county operations and transitioning services to a nonprofit.
"I think it's clear Allcove is saving lives," the committee chair said, summarizing student testimony from a county listening session and urging a coordinated local response. Committee members described Allcove as a "no-wrong-door" model that reaches young people who might not otherwise enter clinical settings.
City staff explained that the county is considering a model in which it remains a funder but shifts day-to-day operations to a nonprofit partner. Under the proposal discussed at county staff level, the county would provide about $2,000,000 annually for core services during a multi-year transition; county staff materials located by the committee put Allcove's full annual budget at an estimated $4,250,000 with roughly 71% devoted to staff salaries and benefits.
Alumrock Counseling has told city officials it is willing to explore taking on operational responsibility, and local leaders discussed options to bridge any gap, including private fundraising, grant applications and in-kind support from partner organizations. City staff said the mayor sent a letter to county behavioral-health leadership asking the county to continue bridge funding while the nonprofit model is stood up.
Committee members pressed staff for details about the proposal timeline and emphasized the need for a unified message from both the city and the school district when lobbying county decision-makers. Staff said they would share the mayor's letter and county materials with the district and pursue follow-up briefings. Members also raised practical concerns about lease costs at the Allcove site and whether fixed costs could be reduced to protect frontline services.
The committee agreed to continue coordinating outreach and to explore contingency options—grants, fundraising and alternative locations—if county funding is reduced. Staff said they will bring updates and any JED Foundation workshop takeaways to future liaison meetings.
Next procedural steps cited by staff: share the mayor's letter with district leaders, identify Allcove point people for rapid stakeholder planning and continue outreach to county behavioral-health staff; committee members requested a consistent lobbying message in the near term.
