Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Animal Welfare topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council adopts ban on retail sales of dogs, cats and rabbits; rescues get carve-out after last-minute edits

Jersey City Municipal Council · November 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Council amended and adopted an ordinance banning the retail sale of dogs, cats and rabbits in Jersey City pet stores, adding explicit protections so animal rescues and shelters can continue to place animals.

Jersey City — The City Council voted to adopt city ordinance 25-113 to prohibit the retail sale of dogs, cats and rabbits in Jersey City pet stores, after making late amendments to preserve normal rescue and shelter operations.

What changed: Rescue groups and animal-welfare advocates told the council that earlier draft language could have unintentionally prevented nonprofit rescue groups and some shelters (which are not all 501(c)(3) organizations) from rehoming animals. In response, the council amended the ordinance to align key definitions with state statute (NJSA 4:19-15.1) and added a provision explicitly stating that nothing in the section prevents animal rescue organizations or shelters from selling or offering animals for adoption.

Public comment: Ariel Lefkovitz, speaking for animal-welfare supporters, described the measure as preventative: “This is to prohibit the sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits in pet stores in Jersey City,” and urged council support to block puppy-mill pipelines. Local rescue leaders including Gina Davison urged the body to pause to ensure community input; the council and administration said they worked to incorporate rescue concerns in the amendments.

Council action and vote: After Corporation Counsel read the amendments into the record, Councilperson Soleil moved to amend and the council adopted the amendments 8–0 (Rivera absent). The ordinance as amended passed final adoption 8–0 with Councilperson Gilmore voting aye; transcript notes the motion carried 8–0 (Rivera absent).

Why it matters: The ordinance is framed as both animal-welfare and consumer-protection policy: sponsor statements and witnesses cited cases of sick animals sold at high profit and poor consumer recourse when an animal becomes ill.

Next steps: Administration and the director of animal control will publish the final ordinance language and enforcement guidance. Advocates asked the city to follow up with stakeholder meetings to discuss enforcement, humane-breeding enforcement, and other related animal-welfare updates.