Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Bond Refunding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sutter Butte board authorizes refunding plan, clearing way for up to $71.5M in bonds

Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Board of Directors · November 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency on Nov. 12 authorized a refunding plan allowing issuance of assessment revenue refunding bonds not to exceed $71.5 million to refinance portions of outstanding 2013 and 2015 bonds; staff estimates roughly $2.1 million net present‑value savings and average annual savings of about $180,000, subject to market and

The Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency on Nov. 12 authorized staff to proceed with an assessment revenue refunding that would allow issuance of bonds with a not‑to‑exceed principal of $71,500,000 to refinance portions of its outstanding 2013 and 2015 assessment revenue bonds. The board voted unanimously to approve the authorizing resolution.

Dan Cox, the agency’s municipal advisor with KNN, told the board the staff recommendation is to approve an authorizing resolution and proceed with a negotiated sale through underwriter Stifel, Nicolaus. "The action would authorize that sale pursuant to a bond purchase agreement provided that the minimum net present value savings is at least 3% of the principal amount of bonds," Cox said, adding later that "we estimate...net present value savings of about $2,100,000" based on the current plan to refund roughly $43,000,000 of outstanding principal.

Why it matters: refinancing can reduce the agency’s debt service burden without extending maturities, freeing operating capacity for projects. Cox said the refunding would not extend final maturity beyond 2040 — and principal would begin annual payments in 2026 under the planned structure. Staff estimates average annual savings of about $180,000 over 15 years but noted the board’s minimum threshold to proceed is 3% NPV savings and that market conditions could change before pricing.

How it would work: the sale is planned as a negotiated offering with Stifel, Nicolaus, the same firm that underwrote prior transactions. The agency expects to purchase a surety from a bond insurer to avoid a cash reserve deposit (reducing the proceeds otherwise held as a reserve) and to achieve better economics. Cox said preliminary sizing is about $43,000,000 in refunding bonds; the final principal amount, interest rates, redemption provisions and any optional call features will be set at pricing.

Timing and next steps: staff said it is seeking a credit rating from Standard & Poor’s (a presentation with S&P staff was scheduled the week after the meeting) and will solicit bond insurer bids. The preliminary official statement would be finalized and circulated to investors before pricing. Staff said pricing is tentatively scheduled for the week of Dec. 1 or Dec. 8, with closing expected about two weeks after pricing, likely in mid‑ to late December, subject to market conditions.

Board action: Director Jeff Stevens moved to approve the item; the motion was seconded and the board approved the authorizing resolution unanimously. The board chair thanked staff for the work preparing the financing.

What remains uncertain: staff emphasized the estimates include market cushions and that the minimum savings test (3% NPV) must be met for the agency to proceed. Final interest rates and the exact refunding amount will be known only at pricing. The agency also noted county charges are deducted from assessment revenues before they flow to the agency, which slightly reduces the amount available for debt service but does not change how interest rates are set.

The agency will return with finalized bond documents and pricing details after market pricing is complete.