Norfolk Public Schools equity report: reading, math and attendance show modest gains; leaders press for fidelity and school‑level accountability
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
The district’s annual equity report shows modest multi‑year gains in reading (62%), math (57%) and science (60%); attendance edged up to 93.3%. Board members pushed for school‑by‑school fidelity in MTSS and stronger tracking of outcomes tied to the 2016 equity policy.
Jerry Smith, director of innovation, community engagement and outreach, presented the division’s annual equity report, which aggregates enrollment, attendance, SOL/assessment and teacher workforce data. Smith said district enrollment continues a slow decline but that Hispanic and multilingual‑learner populations are growing. Attendance rose from 92.8% to 93.3%, and reading performance increased to 62%.
Smith and other staff described SOL trends and interventions: math performance rose from 50% to 57% over three years with notable gains for Black, Hispanic and economically disadvantaged students; science rose from 55% to 60%. Smith said the Virginia Language and Literacy Screening (VALS) established a baseline for early literacy, noting 34.5% of kindergarteners, 40.1% of first‑graders and 31.9% of second‑graders were identified as high‑risk in the VALS spring administration.
Board members asked how equity priorities drive school consolidations, staffing plans and budget tradeoffs. Staff explained changes to the Comprehensive School Support Plan (CSSP) timeline to make school goals and data feedback part of earlier planning; they said non‑teaching positions such as reading and math specialists would be redistributed to address inequitable staffing during consolidation implementation. Staff also described expanded principal coaching and targeted professional development to improve implementation fidelity of MTSS and EELC initiatives.
Several trustees urged a retrospective view of the 2016 equity policy and asked for a decade‑long assessment of impact. Staff committed to more granular, school‑level monitoring and noted that some data streams (including state growth measures) were still being aligned with new statewide assessments.
The presentation did not result in new policy actions; staff described timeline and accountability changes that will inform budget and staffing recommendations.