Citizen Portal

Parkway Board approves 2025–26 fall budget adjustments after senior tax-freeze reduces revenue

Parkway Board of Education · November 13, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

CFO told the board county senior tax-freeze claims cost Parkway about $2.8 million more than expected; board approved fall budget adjustments, moving expenditures and revenues across funds. Motion carried 7–0.

The Parkway Board of Education approved fall 2025–26 budget adjustments (item 11.06) on Nov. 12 after a discussion led by Carrie Nunn, the district’s chief financial officer, who described revenue impacts largely tied to a county senior tax-freeze program.

Nunn told the board that about 13,300 parcels across St. Louis County applied for the senior credit and that Parkway’s rounded revenue loss from the program was $2.8 million — roughly $1.8 million more than the district had previously anticipated. She also cited a roughly $1.0 million reduction linked to an incorrectly assessed property and additional reductions from delinquent property taxes and rate-setting adjustments.

As presented to the board, the adjusted fund totals were: general fund expenditures of $110,408,946 and revenues of $103,464,460; special fund expenditures of $171,694,621 and revenues of $174,197,372; debt service fund expenditures of $21,914,584 and revenues of $34,586,005; and capital projects fund expenditures of $90,409,601 and revenues of $116,420,229. All-funds totals were listed as $394,427,751 in expenditures and $428,668,675 in revenues.

Board members moved and seconded the motion to approve the budget adjustments; the motion carried 7–0.

During the presentation, board members and staff reiterated that statewide fiscal policy and potential changes to income or property-tax structures remain uncertainties that could affect future budgets. The board also referenced a separate compensation study and ongoing committee reviews that will continue to inform budget priorities.