Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sidewalks And Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plat committee requires sidewalk commitment for Shelby Street replat after staff recommendation
Summary
The Indianapolis City Plat Committee approved the replat for 8707 Shelby Street but rejected a petitioner request to waive the sidewalk requirement, instead adding a recorded commitment that the required sidewalk be shown on the secondary plat prior to recording and allowing administrative approval of any alternate siting.
The Indianapolis City Plat Committee on Nov. 12 approved a replat for 8707 Shelby Street but declined the petitioner’s request to waive the sidewalk requirement, adopting a compromise requiring the sidewalk to be shown on the secondary plat and allowing an alternate location by administrative approval.
Staff recommended denial of the requested sidewalk waiver, saying the site — zoned HD2, a hospital district with senior-oriented uses nearby — did not show a site-specific practical difficulty that would justify a waiver. "The requirement here will be 550 linear feet of sidewalk along the frontage," planning staff said, noting existing bus stops and nearby senior housing that increase the need for pedestrian connectivity.
Petitioner representatives said they intend to add sidewalks when a site plan is submitted and that a premature installation could be torn up once development specifics are known. The committee discussed using a performance bond to protect the city while giving the developer timing flexibility. Committee members and staff proposed language to deny the waiver request while adding a new commitment that the required sidewalk "shall be shown on and affixed to the final (secondary) plat prior to recording, with any alternative location of the sidewalk to be administratively approved by the Administrator of Current Planning." The committee approved the plat with that added condition by roll call.
The committee recorded that a bond would still be required before recording and that the bond would not be released until development had sufficient detail, giving staff a measure of security that sidewalks will be built when development proceeds. Staff said alternate siting could be considered administratively to accommodate final site plans and drainage or access requirements.
The action resolves the immediate plat question while leaving permit-level drainage review, exact sidewalk alignment and installation timing to later processes. The committee emphasized that denial of a waiver does not prevent administrative flexibility for sidewalk siting; it requires the linear footage be secured on the recorded secondary plat before recordation.
What happens next: The petitioner must show the required sidewalk on the secondary plat prior to recording and comply with any bond and administrative approval process tied to final site plans and permits.
