Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Continuances topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tampa council grants multiple continuances after neighborhood objections to stacked land‑use dockets

Tampa City Council · November 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a lengthy public comment period, Tampa City Council agreed to postpone several land‑use hearings, including TACPA2411, and withdrew two mis‑noticed items. Residents urged better scheduling; the applicant requested the delays to align associated rezoning and site approvals.

Tampa City Council on Nov. 13 voted to continue multiple land‑use hearings and cleared two mis‑noticed items from the agenda after an hour of procedural debate and public comment.

The meeting opened with a request from planning staff that the council rule on a continuance for file TACPA2411, a comprehensive plan amendment tied to a rezoning and vacation application. Applicant Truett Gardner said coordination with solid waste and contractual timing made January 15 unworkable and urged a later coordinated date; neighborhood speakers said the frequent continuances had discouraged public turnout and asked the council to avoid stacking large dockets.

Councilman Carlson moved to continue TACPA2411 to Feb. 12, 2026, on the condition that the applicant re‑notice the public hearing; Councilman Maniscalco seconded. The motion passed by voice vote; the chair announced the hearing will be heard on 02/12/2026. During the same sequence the council granted first continuances or schedule changes for several related items: VAC258 (moved to 02/12/2026), REZ2548 (continued to 02/12/2026), and REZ25112 (continued to 01/15/2026) after applicants agreed to renotice.

Several neighborhood representatives spoke during the continuance discussion. Michelle Battilero of the Historic Hyde Park Art Gallery said members did not attend because the request was presented as a "done deal" and asked that the council avoid putting contentious items on the same night. Joe Hanlon, a Hyde Park resident, opposed continuing the matter. Bobby O'Brien of the Spanish Town Creek Civic Association said he changed his view to support a continuance to avoid an unfairly long evening for residents and experts. Applicants and staff repeatedly said scheduling constraints and contract deadlines drove the timing requests.

The council also removed two items (REZ25100 and a separate REZ‑numbered item) from the agenda after they were found to be mis‑noticed or withdrawn by applicants. The council then adopted the amended agenda and proceeded to the remainder of the docket.

What happens next: TACPA2411 and the companion cases will be renoticed and considered at the Feb. 12, 2026 hearing; withdrawn items will not be heard on this docket.

Quotes from the meeting: "If this matter is gonna be continued, can it be put on a date other than January 15…where we will be the number one item?" — Michelle Battilero, Historic Hyde Park Art Gallery. "We were actually ready to proceed tonight…but solid waste wanted us to redesign," said Truett Gardner, applicant.