Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lititz Borough weighs parking-meter increases, merchants and residents urge better payment options

Lititz Borough Council · November 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council reviewed staff analysis showing a $0.25 per-hour increase would add roughly $31,000 annually and $0.50 would add about $62,000; merchants favored not 'bagging' meters for the holiday season while public commenters urged improved credit-card and app functionality.

Taneya (speaker 5) presented an analysis of downtown parking-meter options, saying raising the rate from $1.00 to $1.25 per hour would generate an estimated $31,000 a year and $1.50 would yield about $62,000.

Council members discussed two linked decisions: whether to increase hourly rates and whether to stop the long-standing practice of bagging meters during the holiday season. One council member said merchants she contacted supported leaving meters active to encourage turnover; she added, “I don't think an extra 50¢ an hour is gonna keep anybody from coming into Lititz.”

Jane Smith, speaking for Venture Lititz, told the council she did not oppose a rate increase but urged the borough to fix meter payment functionality before raising rates. She said many users — both visitors and residents — struggle with credit-card transactions at the meters and asked the borough to prioritize a solution. “If there's something — an app component — that could be added, please keep that top of mind,” Jane said.

Jared (speaker 10) described the 2024 payment split for meters as roughly two-thirds cash and one-third card and said vendors have reported limits such as bank processing time and connectivity; he suggested exploring an app feature but said staff need to analyze implementation costs and timing. Council asked Jared to provide dollar estimates for additional rate scenarios and to return with a recommendation ahead of the budget-advertising timeline.

No formal rate change was adopted at the meeting; council members voiced informal consensus to move away from bagging and to pursue rate and payment updates for 2026.