Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners press staff on single‑trade permit delays and private‑provider oversight
Summary
Following public comment, county staff described how private providers and local building officials interact under state law, said single‑trade permits in Unincorporated Miami‑Dade are typically fast‑tracked with next‑day inspections, and agreed to provide written timelines and examples to address reported delays.
After a public commenter described delays and extra steps for single‑trade home permits, the Efficiency & Oversight Committee questioned county building and regulatory staff about whether private providers are causing open permits and downstream problems for homeowners.
Public comment and the concern: Ian Cohen, president of the private inspection firm Inspected, told the committee that Miami‑Dade building‑department practices are delaying plan reviews and inspections and that the county’s interpretation of private‑provider statutes is inconsistent with state law, causing long permit closeout delays in some jurisdictions.
RER and Board of Rules & Appeals response: Lourdes Gomez (RER) and Jamie Gaskin (support to the Board of Rules & Appeals) said state statutes define private‑provider roles but leave gaps the county has tried to address with a common framework. Gaskin said building officials must still verify zoning, flood, and other non‑building requirements before issuing a final certificate, and those checks can delay closeout even when a private provider has handled building inspections. He noted the legislature changes the statute periodically, which complicates uniform countywide implementation.
UMSA practice and quality assurance: Edward Rojas, the Unincorporated Municipal Service Area (UMSA) building official, said UMSA generally issues many residential single‑trade permits over the counter with 24‑hour plan review and next‑day inspections; he said private‑provider utilization in UMSA is in the single digits. Rojas said UMSA offers in‑person and virtual inspections and that county staff perform a paperwork/site check before closing permits to ensure compliance with ordinances and codes outside the private‑provider scope.
Committee request and follow up: Commissioners asked for a written breakdown of timelines and examples (from application to closeout) so the committee can assess whether the county is meeting statutory shot‑clock requirements and where delays occur. Staff agreed to provide time frames and to investigate interjurisdictional disparities, particularly in municipalities that operate their own building departments.
What remains unresolved: The meeting did not produce a countywide fix; staff will review municipal practices, provide written timelines and examples, and follow up with the committee.
