Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environmental Monitoring topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews $400,000 multiyear environmental monitoring request tied to FAA AIP reimbursement
Summary
Airport staff requested a $400,000 total appropriation to cover four years of environmental monitoring for the Taxiway Golf project; staff said 90% of eligible costs are reimbursed by the FAA AIP, with MassDOT covering 5% and the town responsible for about 5%. Committee debated whether to appropriate the full multiyear total at once or handle it year by year.
Airport and finance staff told the Capital Program Committee on Nov. 13 that ongoing environmental monitoring is required following the Taxiway Golf project and related mitigation work at South Bay Brook, and that the FAA requires monitoring for multiple years.
"This is just the continued environmental monitoring for the taxiway Golf project," the airport representative said. Staff said their consultant (McFarland-Johnson, MJ) currently carries a contract and uses VHB as a subconsultant to monitor plant survival and management in mitigation areas. The airport requested a total appropriation of $400,000 to cover multiple years of monitoring, explaining that the FAA reimburses roughly 90% of eligible costs through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP), MassDOT covers 5% and the town would carry the remaining 5% from retained earnings.
Committee members asked whether appropriating the full $400,000 now would create procurement or reimbursement risk two to three years out; staff responded that AIP awards usually reserve total grant amounts and that reimbursement follows incurred expenditures. "We're gonna get a total appropriation of $400,000 at Town Meeting," Maria said, and staff noted the airport would submit invoices as work is completed to obtain FAA reimbursement.
The committee discussed contract timing (MJ contract scheduled for completion in 2027) and whether future monitoring could be performed by a different consultant if that contract expires. Staff said the monitoring requirement continues even when a particular consultant’s contract ends and that other consultants could be engaged for follow-on years. Committee members asked for clearer funding and schedule breakdowns in the supplemental documents before final action.
