Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment Trash topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge township to examine municipal trash options and seek clearer fund breakdowns

Concord Township Board/ Council · November 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During the 2026 budget hearing, multiple residents urged the board to study township‑run or township‑procured trash collection to reduce costs for fixed‑income households; others asked for clearer reporting of fund balances and restricted vs. unrestricted cash.

During public comment Jane DeFlorio (speaker 8) told the board she has seen township‑provided trash service elsewhere and asked whether Concord Township could help reduce residents’ trash costs, especially for fixed‑income households. "If that's something the township could help with, I don't know if it's a good idea, a bad idea or not," she said.

Council members responded that the township has considered municipal trash in the past but concluded direct in‑house service can be more expensive because of staff, vehicles and workers'‑comp costs; one council member suggested the township can still put trash collection out to bid in zones or subcontract the service as a township procurement option. Council members thanked DeFlorio for the suggestion and said staff can examine viable procurement models.

Several commenters also asked for clearer reporting on the township’s aggregate balance sheet after staff presented a township‑wide cash and investment total; residents requested breakdowns that separate restricted and developer‑committed funds from unrestricted capital reserves so taxpayers can better understand what funds are available for new projects. Staff pointed to audited financial statements and online reports and agreed to explore clearer communications in follow‑up materials.