Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Remote Participation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Winona County staff recommends removing public Zoom join links; commissioners weigh security vs. access
Summary
County staff recommended removing public Zoom join links and shifting to view‑only livestreams after repeated ‘Zoom‑bombing’ disruptions, prompting residents and several commissioners to argue remote call‑in access remains important for rural and winter‑time accessibility.
Winona County administrators proposed removing public Zoom join links from the county website and preserving only view‑only livestreams, citing repeated disruptions to virtual meetings. "It's my recommendation to make it a live stream," said the county IT/administration lead, who told the board staff have implemented waiting rooms, unique passcodes and disabled whiteboard sharing as interim measures.
Cassidy Serapi, a Winona resident who spoke during public comment, said she opposed eliminating the phone/call‑in option for public comment (agenda item 7.3), noting long travel distances within the county and winter driving hazards. "I am against this… So please don't get rid of this," Serapi said, asking commissioners to preserve remote participation options for residents unable to travel.
County Attorney Soneman advised the board that Minnesota’s open meeting law allows a public body to limit opportunities to speak online even while preserving the public’s right to observe. "The open meeting law does not require that a public body give people the right to speak at meetings," Soneman told the commissioners, adding that written comments and in‑person comment remain options.
Commissioners debated compromises, including keeping a Zoom link behind an extra click on the agenda page, continuing waiting‑room moderation, or locking meetings after start time to reduce the risk of malicious disruptions. Several commissioners said they preferred trying tightened security measures before removing call‑in options entirely to avoid excluding rural residents. One commissioner said some jurisdictions have moved to livestream‑only during the pandemic, but others urged caution so residents who rely on call‑in access are not frozen out.
The board did not adopt an immediate policy change at the meeting; staff said they would continue implementing security fixes, consider posting Zoom join links behind an agenda page, and could return with a specific policy recommendation if the disruptions persist.
What's next: Staff will continue security hardening (waiting room, passcodes, meeting lock, removal of whiteboard sharing) and return to the board with options; no final policy removing call‑in participation was enacted at this meeting.
