Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves roof, bleacher and course‑catalog measures; sets I‑20 tuition
Summary
The board approved multiple action items unanimously: a $3,868,363 roof replacement at Bogle Junior High (state‑funded), awarding a Norcon bleacher contract with a $250,000 ASTA grant match component, approval of high‑school and junior‑high course catalogs, and set the I‑20 student tuition at $10,906.12 for FY 2026‑27.
At its Nov. 12 meeting the Chandler Unified Governing Board approved a slate of action items and motions that passed unanimously.
The board approved a Progressive Roofing contract for Bogle Junior High roof replacement, a project funded by a School Facilities Division building renewal grant in the amount of $3,868,363; district staff said construction would begin in January with a 12–18 month completion estimate.
The board approved the 2026–27 high‑school and junior‑high course catalogs and updates to new courses and descriptions; staff noted one compliance‑officer change in the catalog materials. Both motions were approved by voice vote during the meeting.
The board set the tuition for I‑20 education‑visa students at $10,906.12 for the 2026–27 fiscal year, using a formula district finance staff apply annually that draws on maintenance and operations, classroom site funds, capital outlay and federal/state project funding. Staff explained the formula and said the district usually updates the fee annually; the board approved the rate by roll‑call vote.
The board also approved awarding Norcon Industries a cooperative Mohave contract (24ED‑NOR1‑1016) for telescopic, platform and fixed spectator seating with estimated FY26 expenditures of $450,000 for projects that include Perry High School (new bleachers) and relocation/upgrade work to ACP High School. District staff explained the project included a $250,000 Arizona Sports & Tourism Authority matching grant, a $125,000 district bond match and a small site contribution; the motion passed unanimously.
Board members asked standard procurement and timeline questions; staff confirmed grant approval, funding sources, and that any unspent SFD grant funds would be returned to the State Facilities Division. The board did not dissent on the packages and approved all items on the consent and action agendas.
