Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Routine Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: consent agenda, write-off, engineering contract, special assessment and zoning ordinance

East Troy Village Board · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved the consent agenda, a small water-billing write-off, an engineering proposal for combined TID projects, a correction to a School Street special assessment schedule, and an amendment to the Honey Creek PDD; motions passed by voice vote.

Several routine but formal actions were approved by the East Troy Village Board on Nov. 17:

- Consent agenda: The board approved the consent agenda by voice vote.

- Write-off: The board approved writing off an uncollectible bulk-water payment discussed as about $56 or $60.05 and asked staff to return with suggested authority thresholds. (Motion moved and seconded; voice vote carried.)

- Engineering proposal (Lynch & Associates): The board approved an engineering services proposal to combine three projects (Main Street sidewalk, corporate circle connection, and pond modification) and to bid them together with separate funding sections. The contract amount presented: $149,155. Motion moved, seconded, and carried.

- Resolution 2025-17 (special assessment): The board approved a resolution correcting a clerical error in the special assessment schedule for ROP 32838 School Street, starting missed installments in 2025 with a 10-year payment schedule and no extra interest because the error was the village’s.

- Ordinance 2025-11 (Honey Creek PDD): The board approved an ordinance amendment allowing electrical service to certain units in a personal storage facility for Lot 2 of CSM 4915 (I 43 Investments LLC; applicant and agent noted in the packet).

All of the above motions were approved by voice vote with no recorded dissenting 'no' votes.