Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning 1125 19th topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission rejects rezoning at 1125 19th Street amid parking, compatibility concerns
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission declined a rezoning request to change 1125 19th Street from MR1 to MR2 after commissioners said the proposal failed to resolve front-yard parking and access issues; the petitioner offered landscaping as mitigation but commissioners said physical constraints in the alley and a retaining wall made rear parking impractical.
The Tuscaloosa Planning and Zoning Commission on Nov. 17 declined a petition (Z24-25) to rezone about 0.18 acres at 1125 19th Street from MR1 to MR2, citing persistent parking and access concerns.
Staff said the property is identified for multifamily residential use and that a duplex is a permitted use but that the existing lot does not meet setback standards under MR1. Tom Sims of Longleaf Engineering, speaking for the owner, told the commission the design team tried to move all required spaces to the rear but encountered a roughly 4-foot retaining wall and a private gate across the alley that prevent practical rear access. Sims said the owner was “willing to maybe do some additional landscaping as sort of a screening for that parking” if front parking were allowed.
Commissioners focused on the risk of vehicles parking in front yards and the difficulty of maneuvering rear spaces in the narrow lot. Commissioner Jim Harrison said the layout felt impractical: “It’s trying to put a basketball through a garden hose,” and other members said the design would likely lead to vehicles parking on grass or blocking alleys. Staff and commissioners noted that parking on the public right-of-way does not count toward duplex parking requirements and that bay parking or grading the retaining wall would require neighbor cooperation or additional variances.
After discussion, the commission moved to vote on the rezoning request; a majority voted against the rezoning, leaving the site in its current MR1 zoning. Commissioners did not adopt a binding landscaping condition as part of the rezoning; staff advised that rezoning approvals typically are not conditioned on landscaping commitments, although the petitioner said he would follow through in good faith.
What happens next: Because the commission’s role is advisory on matters that require council action, the record and the commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to City Council as appropriate. The petitioner may revise plans to address access and parking concerns — for example, pursuing grading or a variance for rear access — and return to the commission or seek relief through other processes.
