Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DRC advises samples, leans toward traditional stone for 713 Glass Lane porch and walkway
Summary
At a November DRC meeting, the applicant for 713 Glass Lane proposed Indiana limestone, ashlar sandstone, or a brick walkway for porch and steps. Staff warned the ashlar sandstone 'appears to have a more modern appearance,' and commissioners asked the applicant to bring material samples and historic evidence to a future voting meeting.
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Franklin City Design Review Committee (DRC) on Tuesday reviewed proposed porch and walkway work at 713 Glass Lane, where applicant Linda Childs, representing homeowner Joanne Haines, said the homeowner's first choice was Indiana limestone but offered sandstone or a brick basket-weave walkway as alternatives.
"Her first choice is Indiana limestone," said Linda Childs, explaining the preference for a muted stone to complement the house's red brick and white trim. Staff, however, urged caution about the specific stone pattern and finish. Emily, a city staff member, said, "The Ashlar Sandstone is a unique material that's not commonly seen in the district ... the proposed Ashlar sandstone and snapped edge sandstones appears to have a more modern appearance and does not appear to align with the guidelines."
Commissioners framed their feedback around visibility and historic compatibility. Several members said the work is on a noncontributing building with low visibility from the street and therefore offers more flexibility. Mary, a commissioner, said visibility meant she had "no problem" with the proposal, while others asked for clarity on the steps' facing and riser materials. One commissioner recommended keeping patterns and textures simple so the application reads as compatible with the district rather than overly stylized.
The DRC did not vote; its role is advisory. Commissioners asked the applicant to return to the formal historic zoning commission with physical samples, clearer details about the proposed edge and riser materials, and any historic documentation that might support alternative finishes. The chair reminded the applicant that any changes made after the DRC are ultimately subject to approval or denial at the voting meeting.

