Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signs Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Petoskey board backs draft language to allow halo-lit signs downtown with limits
Summary
After debate, the Downtown Management Board signaled support for proposed ordinance language that would allow halo/backlit signs downtown subject to limits on illuminated area, neutral color tones and brightness; planning staff will refine technical measures and carry the recommendation back to the planning commission.
The Downtown Management Board on Tuesday moved to give the planning commission guidance that halo-lit (backlit) signage can be permitted downtown under specific limits. Speaker 3, who presented the design committee's review, said the committee originally did not recommend halo lighting because the downtown is within a national-register historic district, but the board discussion favored permitting halo-lit signs with controls.
The board focused on three constraints the committee proposed: counting any lighted area toward the sign’s measured surface area, limiting the lighted portion to no more than 20% of total sign area, and capping light emission (the draft cites a 100-nit maximum). Speaker 3 explained technical details and design input, including typical mounting distances of roughly 1½ to 2 inches from the building face.
Members voiced broad support for allowing halo signs in principle while guarding visual character. Speaker 7 argued halo lighting brightens downtown without creating glare — “they're not affecting drivers or anything” — and Speaker 1 said tasteful illumination can improve nighttime safety and ambiance. Several members asked planning staff to retain a neutral-color requirement rather than permit vivid colored backlighting: Speaker 8 summarized that 'neutral' means no color, and the group discussed warm (about 4,200 K) versus cool (about 6,500 K) color temperatures.
The board also considered whether signs should be required to be illuminated only during business hours. Speaker 3 reported that the design committee did not think an hours restriction was necessary because signage aids identification and safety; some members disagreed, but the majority left enforcement and specific numeric limits to the planning commission and staff.
What happens next: the board directed staff to pass the recommended language to the planning commission for refinement of numeric limits (brightness, projection/distance to wall and measurement method) and for consideration of enforcement practice. No formal ordinance change was adopted by the board at the meeting; the discussion supplied the planning commission and staff with the board’s policy direction.
