Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reentry Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Peoria council defers decision on proposed halfway house at 1924 Southwest Adams after questions about residents and building upgrades
Summary
Council deferred action on a special‑use request to open a 10–12‑bed halfway house at 1924 Southwest Adams after members sought clearer information about where residents would originate and what building improvements are required; proponents emphasized mental‑health services and workforce development.
The Peoria City Council on Nov. 18 deferred action on a special‑use request to establish a 10–12‑bed halfway house at 1924 Southwest Adams after extended council questions about resident origin, building condition, and services.
Assistant Community Development staff told council the proposal envisions a 16‑week program for roughly 10–12 parolees from the Illinois Department of Corrections, three daytime staff, and 24/7 security. "The present proposal is for a halfway house for about 10 to 12 parolees from the Illinois Department of Corrections that will reside there through a 16 week program," staff said. They added the building has been vacant for years and will require inspections and life‑safety upgrades before occupancy.
Supporters from Grow, a reentry‑focused mental‑health provider, described program services. James McCoy, a therapist with Grow, said mental‑health therapy is central: "The main thing that really needs to be mentioned is this mental health therapy." Darryl Pierce, Grow supervisor, said the organization plans to recruit locally and regionally: "We will be basically working with people around in East, in the Central Illinois. We won't be bringing people from Chicago." Carl Holloway later said, "These individuals are from Peoria," asserting residents targeted for the program would have Peoria ties.
Several council members asked for more definitive proof about resident origin and clearer estimates of the building investment required to meet code. One councilmember said the downtown/warehouse district already has a substantial concentration of social‑service programs and that further clustering was a concern. After debate, Councilmember Riggenbach moved and Councilmember Euler seconded a motion to defer the item. The motion carried.
Transcript notes and next steps: the record contains inconsistent scheduling references: the deferral motion was discussed with dates mentioned as December 8 and December 9, and the clerk recorded the item as deferred "until Tuesday, November 28." Council directed staff to provide clearer documentation on where residents would originate and the scope and cost of building upgrades before the item returns to council.
