Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Promotion And Retention Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Somers Board adopts 30‑hour summer intervention for some middle‑school students
Summary
At its Nov. 18 workshop the Somers Central School District Board of Education adopted a revision to Policy 47.50 requiring certain middle‑school students who fail more than two courses in a year or the same subject for two consecutive years to complete a 30‑hour, discipline‑specific summer program before progressing to the next grade; the change supplements existing interventions and allows alternate plans and accommodations.
At a Nov. 18 board workshop, the Somers Central School District Board of Education adopted a revision to Policy 47.50 (Promotion and Retention) that requires certain middle‑school students to complete a 30‑hour, discipline‑specific summer skill‑building program before advancing to the next grade.
The policy language read at the meeting states that "at the middle school level, any student who fails more than 2 courses in a school year or fails the same subject for 2 consecutive years will be expected to attend and complete a summer academic, discipline‑specific skill building program in order to progress to the next grade level," a passage read aloud by a board speaker during the first reading. Board members moved and seconded the recommendation and, after discussion, adopted the policy by voice vote.
District administrators and board members framed the change as an additional, targeted bridge to prevent students with foundational gaps from entering high school unprepared. Administrators stressed that the policy does not replace earlier interventions: the recommendation must be accompanied by documented attempts at intervention and collaborative efforts with parents or guardians, consistent with the district’s response‑to‑intervention practices. Staff said the 30 hours are meant to target specific discipline skills (for example, discrete math skills needed to enter algebra) rather than to replay an entire semester course.
At the meeting administrators said the policy was locally developed in response to observed student needs, not mandated by the state. They noted related district offerings (science research, IB courses, Project Lead The Way, BOCES partnerships and seals such as biliteracy and civic readiness) as ways students already demonstrate learning beyond standard tests.
Board members raised operational questions during discussion. The policy’s paragraph 5 assigns parents responsibility for transportation to and from the program but administrators said they will work with individual families and consider remote or alternative plans to ensure access when needed. The board also confirmed that accommodations required by 504 plans or individualized education programs will follow students into any summer program.
Trustees asked staff to track outcomes. One board member requested that district presenters include future data showing whether the summer intervention reduces ninth‑grade failure rates; administrators said the policy will be operationalized in regulation and that appropriate data retention can be built into that process.
The board did not record a detailed roll‑call tally in the spoken transcript; the chair called for the question, the vote was taken by voice and the motion passed. Administrators stated the policy will be implemented beginning the coming summer and that the district will notify parents and students with explanatory materials and a planned webinar for families.
