Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board weighs athletic field construction bid, contingency and change-order process
Summary
Board members extensively questioned construction bid totals, alternates and contingency treatment for a proposed athletic field project; staff recommended monthly payment and change-order reporting and proposed administrative approval for change orders under $10,000.
Board members spent the meeting’s substantive discussion time on a proposed athletic field construction project, probing bid totals, alternates and how contingency and change orders will be handled.
At the outset staff walked the board through differences between the bid-line totals and the front-sheet summary, explaining that the higher front-sheet figure includes soft costs and an approximately 5 percent allowance for soft costs; change-order contingency was presented separately. Board members asked for a single, consistent “bottom-line” figure moving forward so the public and board are clear whether future reporting will include contingency and change orders in totals.
Members debated specific alternates on the bid package. Staff described two options: remove the Trimmer-related work now and vote on it later, or approve it pending required permitting. There was also clarification that the concession-storage alternate for the softball facility would be taken as a deduct (credit) and therefore removed from the base scope.
Board members raised construction risk questions. One member asked whether a contractor bore the risk for subsurface rock, and staff said the bid treated rock as an unclassified item the contractor had assumed based on available core samples; a rock clause remains in the contract language to address unforeseen conditions.
On cost governance, staff proposed a change-order approval threshold: administrative approval for change orders of $10,000 or less, with any change orders of $10,001 or more brought to the board for final approval. Staff committed to presenting a monthly reconciliation report showing payments, added or removed change orders and any credits so the board can track spending against the project budget.
No final project vote was recorded in the meeting transcript; board members indicated next steps would include confirming permitting and returning to the board for any items that exceed the administrative change-order threshold.
