Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Longmeadow reports mixed 2025 MCAS results; grade‑10 declines notable
Summary
District officials presented 2025 MCAS results showing modest state-level shifts but a significant drop in Longmeadow grade‑10 results; administrators urged using MCAS as one data point while prioritizing school-level data teams to address subgroup gaps.
Longmeadow School Committee received the district’s 2025 achievement and accountability briefing on Nov. 18, focusing on MCAS statewide trends and local results.
Dr. Nelson reviewed statewide patterns and local outcomes: statewide English language arts showed small movement but remains below pre‑pandemic levels; grade‑10 results fell sharply across the state and at Longmeadow, where grade‑10 composite performance decreased by roughly 10 percentage points. High‑school math at Longmeadow dipped about eight percentage points, while grade‑5 science produced gains (grade‑5 up six points). Dr. Nelson noted that statewide, grade‑10 declines prompted questions about whether the 2024 ballot change removing MCAS as the competency-determination method influenced student engagement on the test.
Administration drew attention to DESE accountability percentiles and noted that Blueberry Hill School received a designation of “requiring assistance” after participation dipped below 95% because a very small number of students with disabilities did not sit for MCAS; presenters stressed this participation issue drove the flag rather than broad performance problems at that school. Presenters also flagged declines among the district’s high‑needs subgroup (students with disabilities, English learners and low‑income students) and a small rise in chronic absenteeism among those students.
Committee members and administrators emphasized MCAS is one indicator among many. Dr. Nelson described how principals, department chairs and coaches are using multiple formative and summative data sources to target instruction, and she urged the committee to view MCAS as a diagnostic tool rather than the sole measure of success.
The presentation concluded with plans for deeper school‑level data analysis and targeted interventions for identified subgroups; committee members did not take formal votes on this item.
