Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves low bid and awards City Hall/Police construction contract; add‑alternate sally port debated
Summary
Harrisville staff reported a low base bid of $9,535,007.98 for the City Hall/Police facility; after discussion the council voted to adopt Resolution 25‑16 to award construction services (motion text records $9,535,798) and authorized consideration of the sally‑port/animal‑control add‑alternate (recorded in the motion as not to exceed $620,628). Transcript contains inconsistent contractor spellings and bid amounts between packet and motion.
Council considered bids and a staff recommendation for the new City Hall and Police facility during the regular meeting. Jenny Knight (city staff) presented the bid results, saying R & O Construction returned the apparent low base bid at $9,535,007.98 and the low add‑alternate (the sally port and animal‑control build‑out) at $620,006.28. Staff asked council whether to build the sally port and animal‑control interior now or deliver the space as a shell for future fit‑out.
City finance advisor Marcus Keller (Cruz & Associates) reviewed the city’s outstanding debt and financing posture, noting three outstanding bond issues and that recently issued proceeds have been earning interest in escrow. Keller explained that the city had explored general obligation (GO) bonds but ultimately issued sales/franchise tax‑backed bonds for this project and described refinancing windows (callable/prepayable in 2028) that could reduce long‑term interest costs.
After discussion of safety, ADA access and long‑term costs, Council Member (recorded as speaker 10) moved to adopt Resolution 25‑16 and award the contract. The motion text in the record states awarding construction to "R and L Construction" for $9,535,798 with the add‑alternate 1 (sally port) not to exceed $620,628; the motion was seconded and passed on a roll‑call vote with recorded affirmative votes from Council Members Lisonbee, Weiss, Fossett, Jackson and Christensen.
Note on inconsistencies: the staff packet and Knight's bid announcement identified the low base bid as R & O Construction at $9,535,007.98 and the add‑alternate at $620,006.28, while the motion language recorded on the floor used a slightly different contractor spelling and rounded amounts ($9,535,798 and $620,628). Those discrepancies appear in the meeting record and staff indicated the contract had been reviewed with city legal counsel before the motion.
What the council authorized: the base construction award and the option to include the sally‑port/animal‑control add‑alternate depending on council direction and contract change‑order pricing. Staff said final interior build‑out costs for the add‑alternate had not been separately bid and would be set with a change order if the council directs full interior completion.
Next steps: with the motion carried, staff will finalize contract documents and execute the construction agreement; council direction will determine whether the sally port/animal‑control space is fully built or left as a shell for future fit‑out.
