Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hubbard County moves to tougher after-the-fact shoreland fees and expanded compliance checks
Summary
Environmental services proposed fee-schedule updates and three options for after-the-fact shoreland variance fees. After discussion about fairness, enforcement and outreach, the board indicated support for option C (a $1,000 fee for the first item and $500 for each additional item) and directed staff to publish the proposal for public hearing.
Hubbard County’s environmental services staff told commissioners on Tuesday that a cursory Changefinder imagery review identified a significant number of unpermitted shoreline constructions since 2017. Staff proposed inflation adjustments across the department fee schedule and three enforcement-fee options for after-the-fact shoreland variances: (a) a flat $2,000 fee, (b) $1,000 per item, or (c) $1,000 for the first item and $500 for each additional item.
S14 (Environmental Services) said the county had permits for just under 50% of the new construction Changefinder flagged and stressed the tool will help staff identify and prioritize noncompliance. Commissioners debated the balance between deterring willful violations and imposing hardship on new property owners who may have bought properties without knowledge of the county shoreline ordinance. Several commissioners favored option C as a middle ground that raises the cost for serial or significant violations while allowing administrative remedies for honest mistakes.
Board members also discussed outreach measures, including creating a concise closing‑packet flyer or checklist to inform new owners of shoreland regulations, and delivering clearer guidance to realtors and title companies. The board asked staff to prepare the fee-change proposal, including option C as the recommended approach, for a public hearing and to bring comparative fee schedules from neighboring counties for benchmarking.
The board did not adopt the fee changes on Tuesday but gave staff direction to proceed toward a formal public hearing with the recommended option.
