Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Façade Renovation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves façade renovation at 813 S. Rail Railroad Avenue with staff-recommended materials

Opelika Historic Preservation Commission · November 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved staff recommendations for a façade renovation at 813 S. Rail Railroad Avenue, allowing widened entry for ADA access, hardy cladding to match framing, new wood full-glass doors, and replacement rear windows and doors; staff emphasized retaining decorative vents where possible.

The Opelika Historic Preservation Commission approved a façade renovation plan for 813 South Rail Railroad Avenue, endorsing staff recommendations that balance accessibility improvements with efforts to retain historic character.

Staff described a proposal to remove a deteriorated wood bulkhead and install a brick base for durability, expand the front entry from 5 to 6 feet to meet accessibility needs, install two new wood full-glass doors, apply hardy cladding to the storefront to match existing framing, replace the rear stoop with a steel door, and install 1-over-1 aluminum-clad double-hung rear windows. Staff recommended retaining decorative bulkhead vents where possible and using a wood or wood-substitute (such as hardy) to retain the historic look.

Commissioners discussed that because the facade work constitutes substantial reconstruction, the opening must meet current building and ADA-accessibility codes. Unidentified Commissioner (Speaker 9) noted salvaged materials could be reused elsewhere in the build-out. One commissioner said the existing wood was rotted and expressed support for a durable substitute.

A motion to approve staff recommendations was made, seconded and the commission carried the motion.

Next steps: The applicant may proceed consistent with the staff-approved materials and code requirements; the commission asked for examples of proposed materials where applicable.