Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates whether the city can pursue unpaid utility bills from renters or must rely on landlords
Summary
Councilmembers discussed how the city recovers unpaid utility bills, with staff saying current ordinance and statute place responsibility on landlords; council directed staff to research statutory language and return with options. The meeting recorded details about landlord agreements and a limited $300 cap in some cases.
A council member asked council and staff whether the city has a mechanism to recover unpaid, delinquent utility bills from renters rather than holding landlords responsible, prompting an extended discussion of the city’s current practice and applicable statute.
"I think the way that the ordinances read is that if the renter doesn't pay, then, unfortunately, it does go to the landlord," an unnamed council member said during the discussion. City staff and other councilmembers responded that the ordinance and state statute as interpreted make the landlord responsible for unpaid utility charges in many cases, and that a recent statutory change and court rulings affect how responsibility is applied.
Staff described a standard "landlord agreement" process: when a landlord signs the agreement and pays timely, their liability can be limited in practice (the meeting record noted a $300 figure as a cap in some administrative arrangements). The council also discussed how the city notifies customers about disconnects and delinquent bills—delinquent notices are not legally required to be sent by certified mail, though staff reported that some notices are sent certified as a matter of office practice.
Council members expressed interest in additional detail and consistent practice across municipalities. City staff committed to research the statutes cited during the meeting, assemble relevant sections of law and court decisions, and send the council a summary and supporting emails they had received from residents.
The discussion produced no formal direction to change ordinance text at this meeting; staff follow-up was requested so the council can consider whether local code or administrative practices should be adjusted.
