Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Princeton HPC approves preservation resolutions, grants certificate for snow guards; schedules Dec. 1 special meeting
Summary
At its Nov. 17 meeting, Princeton’s Historic Preservation Commission adopted resolutions for seminary properties and other applications, approved lead‑coated copper snow guards at 610 Nassau Street, and moved a pool‑house project forward; one application was deferred to a Dec. 1 special meeting due to a member’s absence.
The Princeton Historic Preservation Commission on Nov. 17 voted on multiple preservation matters and approved exterior changes for a handful of properties while deferring one application to a special meeting on Dec. 1.
Key outcomes at a glance
- Seminary properties (Mercer Hill District): The commission adopted a resolution documenting the findings for multiple Princeton Theological Seminary addresses and clarified language about pathway/driveway lighting; the motion to adopt was moved by David and seconded by Chairperson Capizzoli and recorded consistent with counsel’s guidance about eligible voters. (See staff packet for addresses.)
- Glenfries project (210 Cherry Hill Road): A motion to approve the resolution for demolition of the existing pool house and construction of a new pool house in the Tusculum Historic District buffer passed after a roll‑call vote.
- Trustees of Princeton University (18–40 Edwards Place): The commission reviewed an application to replace windows, doors, siding, trim, railings and lighting in the Mercer Hill District; discussion proceeded but one application later lacked a quorum for a full vote when member Shirley Satterfield reported a fall and could not attend.
- 610 Nassau Street (Serena Holdings LLC): The commission approved the installation of lead‑coated copper Alpine PD10R pad‑style snow guards visible from Nassau Street to reduce pedestrian hazards. Staff described installation pattern and materials; commissioners agreed the design would weather and blend with slate roofing. The motion to approve was moved by David and seconded by Roger; roll‑call votes were recorded in the affirmative.
Why it matters: The votes implement routine preservation oversight — approving materials and documenting findings — while balancing public‑safety measures (snow guards) and preserving historic streetscape character. One important administrative item: the board set a Dec. 1 special meeting to complete a deferred application because of a member’s unexpected absence.
What’s next: Staff will finalize revised resolution language (pathway lighting references) for the seminary items, prepare advisory memos as needed, and circulate details for the Dec. 1 special meeting. The zoning board will handle any formal variance requests referred by HPC.
Votes and procedural notes are recorded in the meeting minutes.
