Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

West Chester council approves three zoning changes for Town Center and parking

November 20, 2025 | West Chester, Chester County, Pennsylvania


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

West Chester council approves three zoning changes for Town Center and parking
The Borough Council of West Chester on Nov. 19 voted to approve three amendments to the borough zoning code addressing parking curbing, a new "unified residential development" use in the Town Center, and Town Center dimensional standards.

Council legal staff explained the changes and confirmed required procedures under the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, saying the ordinances were advertised and reviewed by county and borough planning bodies. The curbing amendment (sec. 112-602(p)) gives the zoning officer discretion to waive mandatory curbing for developments with three or more parking spaces when the public works director or fire department deem alley widths unsafe for curbs. The council characterized that change as a narrow safety and engineering exception rather than a broad policy shift.

The second amendment adds definitions and permits "unified residential development" — denser townhome or twin-home configurations suggested in a developer proposal for 410 South High Street — as a principal use in the Town Center, and establishes standards, including applying West Chester Historic District design guidelines to those dwellings. The third change revises area and bulk standards for the Town Center (sec. 112-309(b)), clarifying previously ambiguous setback language by setting front-yard and side-yard setbacks to 0 feet where appropriate.

There were no public speakers objecting during the hearing and a single motion to approve all three ordinances passed in roll call: Miss Dorsey—Yes; Miss Vaccaro—Yes; Mister McGinnis—Yes; Mister Travis—Yes; Miss Simone—Yes; Mister McCoy—Yes; Mister Flynn—Absent. Solicitor staff confirmed the motion covered all three ordinances. The council chair closed the public hearing and moved to the next agenda item.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee