Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

PSC approves WEPCO's 2026 fuel cost plan but excludes Elm Road co-firing charges

November 21, 2025 | Public Service Commission, State Agencies, Executive, Wisconsin



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

PSC approves WEPCO's 2026 fuel cost plan but excludes Elm Road co-firing charges
The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin voted Nov. 20 to approve Wisconsin Electric Power Company's 2026 monitored fuel cost plan, adopting commission staff's audited estimate and maintaining an adjustment that excludes certain natural-gas co-firing costs at the Elm Road plant.

Commissioner Neach, who led the discussion, said the utility filed monitored fuel costs for 2026 at $43.42 per megawatt-hour but that staff's audit, after twelve adjustments, revised the estimate to $45.24 per megawatt-hour, a 4.57% increase over the 2025 estimate. Neach said staff's adjustments increased the applicant's filed plan by nearly $43 million overall, and identified adjustment number 12 as the lone contested item.

"Adjustment number 12 reflects the removal of all gas co-firing and related demand charges from the modeling of the Elm Road and Weston coal units," Neach said, summarizing the contested issue. She told colleagues that the contested portion tied to the Elm Road units amounted to $9,763,000 and that the total adjustment reduced monitored fuel costs by $10,353,000.

Staff argued the proposed co-firing testing lacked sufficient substantiation in the record'no detailed plans, schedules, or quantitative analysis showing why the expense should be included in 2026 rates. Neach and other commissioners noted the commission had not authorized a conversion to full natural-gas fuel flexibility at Elm Road and said the commission generally does not allow recovery of costs that rely on anticipated future commission approvals.

Chair Strand said she agreed with staff's approach and the need for strong justification in the record before authorizing rate recovery. "I didn't see enough to demonstrate the operational need for doing the co-firing at ERGs in 2026," Strand said.

With commissioners aligned on maintaining staff's adjustment (alternative 1), Speaker 3 moved to approve the WEPCO 2026 fuel cost plan consistent with the discussion; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. The commission noted that next year's reconciliation (the true-up) will compare the estimate to actual costs and adjust customer bills accordingly.

The commission recorded the approval in docket 6630ER107. The order reflects staff's audited monitored cost estimate and excludes the contested Elm Road co-firing modeling and demand charges from the 2026 monitored fuel costs.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Wisconsin articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI