County solicitor: judge upheld ballot-marking device screen; county remailed replacement packets after wrong-ballot mailing
November 19, 2025 | Northampton County, Pennsylvania
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Assistant county solicitor Mr. Vargo told the commission that a court challenge to how candidates appear on the ballot-marking-device screen was decided by Judge Dally, who found the current screen design legal. “Judge Dally … did indicate that the way that the ballot marking devices currently … screen is currently designed is legal,” Vargo said.
Vargo and Registrar Christopher Camini described the county’s handling of an isolated Easton precinct mailing error. Camini said the office traced the issue to the first day of a 25,000-ballot mailing, identified about 50 potentially affected ballots, and implemented a remediation plan: the office attempted phone and email contact for two days, remailed replacement packets to voters who had returned originals, canceled the original ballots so they could not be counted twice, and offered alternatives for those who came to polling places. Camini summarized the outcomes: of the original mailing, 29 voters returned replacement ballots; 12 returned the original ballot but not the replacement (the original was counted); two voters surrendered their original packet and voted in person on machines; one cast a provisional ballot; and four did not return any ballot nor vote.
Camini and Vargo emphasized that the county segregates cured ballots and ballots with missing or incorrect dates and that statute prohibits pre-canvassing or opening mail-in ballots before receipt. Vargo said the county contacts voters to allow them to cure undated or misstated ballots where possible.
Commissioners asked whether machines could be reprogrammed to list cross-filed candidates differently on screens. Vargo said he did not know whether manufacturers could or would offer an alternative layout and recommended submitting questions to the vendor (ES&S) and reviewing any vendor responses at a public meeting. The commission did not order immediate machine reprogramming at the meeting.
The commission asked staff to forward vendor questions and to include this topic for the incoming commission to review if needed.
Vargo and Registrar Christopher Camini described the county’s handling of an isolated Easton precinct mailing error. Camini said the office traced the issue to the first day of a 25,000-ballot mailing, identified about 50 potentially affected ballots, and implemented a remediation plan: the office attempted phone and email contact for two days, remailed replacement packets to voters who had returned originals, canceled the original ballots so they could not be counted twice, and offered alternatives for those who came to polling places. Camini summarized the outcomes: of the original mailing, 29 voters returned replacement ballots; 12 returned the original ballot but not the replacement (the original was counted); two voters surrendered their original packet and voted in person on machines; one cast a provisional ballot; and four did not return any ballot nor vote.
Camini and Vargo emphasized that the county segregates cured ballots and ballots with missing or incorrect dates and that statute prohibits pre-canvassing or opening mail-in ballots before receipt. Vargo said the county contacts voters to allow them to cure undated or misstated ballots where possible.
Commissioners asked whether machines could be reprogrammed to list cross-filed candidates differently on screens. Vargo said he did not know whether manufacturers could or would offer an alternative layout and recommended submitting questions to the vendor (ES&S) and reviewing any vendor responses at a public meeting. The commission did not order immediate machine reprogramming at the meeting.
The commission asked staff to forward vendor questions and to include this topic for the incoming commission to review if needed.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting