Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

County controller warns proposed 10% fund-balance rule would be 'unfunded mandate'

November 21, 2025 | Northampton County, Pennsylvania



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County controller warns proposed 10% fund-balance rule would be 'unfunded mandate'
Tara Zrinsky, who identified herself at the Nov. 20 meeting as Northampton County controller, used her public comment period to criticize a proposed ordinance that would increase the county's minimum fund-balance stabilization requirement to 10 percent. Zrinsky said the change was "an unfunded mandate" and that, in the context of the FY2026 budget, it "fails to meet our county's statutory and moral obligations while burdening future administrations."

Zrinsky described program cuts and funding gaps in the proposed budget: she said the LEAP program and court-ordered Pine Brook services will be cut effective Dec. 31, 2025; she said county contributions to the pension and retiree health care were not included in the proposed budget. "This pension alone requires 11 to $12,000,000 per year," she said, and she estimated a budgetary shortfall of roughly $14,800,000 heading into 2027. She urged the council not to codify a 10 percent minimum that cannot be met under current revenue assumptions.

Council members acknowledged the warning and debated whether the stabilization fund should be protected for emergencies (state budget impasses, disasters) or used as a routine budget tool. The transcript records a series of procedural and amendment attempts after the controller's remarks and a recorded roll-call vote later in the meeting.

Zrinsky concluded by urging careful consideration of statutory obligations and the county's long-term fiscal health; council members said they would continue deliberations in upcoming hearings.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting