Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Response topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Superintendent Bedell defends staff work, says redistricting is difficult and urges respectful public discourse
Summary
Superintendent Dr. Bedell acknowledged redistricting's difficulty, defended staff and the consultant process and asked the public to avoid questioning staff credentials; he explained his absence at a prior hearing and said staff adjusted plans after board amendments.
Dr. Bedell, the superintendent of Anne Arundel County Public Schools, opened the public hearing by acknowledging the emotional difficulty of redistricting and defending staff work and the district’s collaboration with its consultant and the IAC.
"For anyone ... to insinuate that my absence from last week's hearing is an indication that I do not take this process or my responsibilities as superintendent of this school district seriously is absolutely unacceptable," Bedell said, explaining he had a longstanding family commitment and that the hearing schedule shifted when additional materials were needed.
Bedell outlined the district's stated accomplishments in recent years — including improved SAT/MCAP scores, staffing levels, and reductions in low-rated schools — and urged speakers to address proposals civilly. He said staff and the IAC "are working effectively together to grapple with the many complex issues having to do with enrollment and facility, capacities issues," and asked the public not to question the integrity of staff who have engaged deeply in the redistricting process.
The superintendent said the district altered hearing dates to allow staff time to incorporate board amendments and prepare materials and noted he had reviewed video of prior sessions. He acknowledged that redistricting decisions are not easy and asked the public to respect staff and the board as they finalize recommendations ahead of the scheduled Nov. 19 vote.
Board-level decisions and technical claims about IAC funding, enrollment projections and safety were contested extensively during public comment. The superintendent’s remarks focused on process and tone rather than offering new technical data at the hearing; speakers subsequently pressed for written clarifications about IAC guidance and projection methodology in the days before the board's scheduled vote.
