Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan Desert Valleys topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission approves Desert Valleys Federal Credit Union expansion with parking questions raised
Summary
The Ridgecrest Planning Commission approved a 4,500-square-foot ancillary building for Desert Valleys Federal Credit Union, including a 1,464-square-foot community room and 53 parking stalls; commissioners and staff debated whether the proposed parking meets mixed-use occupancy requirements.
The Ridgecrest Planning Commission voted to approve Site Plan Review 25-03, allowing Desert Valleys Federal Credit Union to add a 4,500-square-foot ancillary building east of its existing site. The commission approved the plan on a 3-0-1 tally, with one abstention.
Planning staff presented the proposal as consistent with the city’s commercial-service zoning and the general plan, noting a maximum building height of 22 feet and 53 parking stalls that include EV-capable and bicycle parking. Staff also advised the project is exempt from CEQA under the Class 3 small-structure exemption.
Commissioners probed whether the 53 parking spaces are adequate for the building’s mixed uses. Commissioners and staff ran a mixed-occupancy calculation during discussion: office space uses the 1-per-300-square-feet standard and the community room uses the 1-per-40-square-feet standard. Architect Bridal Williams said the community room’s usable area is 1,464 square feet of the total 4,500, leaving about 3,000 square feet for offices. “The community room itself is actually, precisely 1,464 square feet of usable area,” Williams said, and the site plan provides a total of 53 parking spaces for the whole site.
Eric Gruen, CEO of Desert Valley Federal Credit Union, told the commission there are adjacent parking areas that could accommodate overflow and thanked the commissioners for reviewing the application. “We’re looking forward to developing,” Gruen said.
Chairman Ferris moved to approve the site plan and a commissioner seconded. The roll-call vote recorded Ferris—Aye; Haman—Aye; Mondragon—Abstain; Boxes—Aye, and the motion carried.
The approval permits the lender’s ancillary building and community room to proceed; staff and the applicant agreed to follow up with precise floor plans and final parking calculations as part of plan-check and building-permit review. The commission did not change parking standards; one public commenter recommended the city consider updating minimum parking requirements in future code amendments.
The Planning Commission closed the public hearing and moved to the next agenda item. The plan will proceed to building-permit and plan-check steps administered by city staff.
