Miami Beach preservation board pauses controversial Fontainebleau water‑park proposal after hours of public opposition
Loading...
Summary
The Historic Preservation Board heard a sprawling proposal to add cabanas, family amenities and a multi‑slide water feature at the Fontainebleau and continued the item to Jan. 13, 2026 after public safety, traffic, visual‑impact and historic‑compatibility concerns. Applicant said the project would not add hotel rooms.
Miami Beach — The Historic Preservation Board on Tuesday continued, without decision, a Fontainebleau Hotel plan that would add a large rear‑yard family amenity area including double‑height cabanas, food kiosks and a multisection water‑slide complex that opponents said would be out of scale with the landmark hotel and the boardwalk.
The board voted to continue the agenda item to the board’s Jan. 13, 2026 meeting, giving staff and the applicant time to meet with residents and refine several of the 11 variance requests tied to dunes, setbacks and open‑space rules.
Why it matters: The Fontainebleau is a contributing historic property in Miami Beach. The hotel’s proposal would legalize and expand a broad swath of amenities along the ocean edge; opponents said the core water‑slide structure — presented as a cluster of elevated slides and a stair/elevator tower — would materially change the beachfront character, increase noise and traffic, and set a precedent for similar attractions on the oceanfront.
What was proposed: Lawyers and designers for the hotel described a family‑focused transformation that reintroduces two‑story cabanas and creates retail and food and beverage offerings beneath those structures. The most contested element was a grouped slide complex described by the applicant as three slide structures comprising up to six slide experiences; the hotel said mechanical and structural elements would be designed to be as open and light as possible.
Public opposition: Dozens of speakers — including condominium owners at Tresor, Sorrento, Blue Diamond and Green Diamond and leaders of nearby neighborhood associations — urged the board to reject or substantially scale back the proposal. “If you allow this 12‑story concrete monstrosity … you are gonna change the entire skyline and the entire city of Miami Beach,” said Mark Weiss, a resident and attorney who testified that the slides would be incompatible with the Lapidus‑era architecture and would overwhelm Collins Avenue traffic.
Applicant response: Counsel Mickey Marrero and the design team said the project is intended for hotel guests and would not add overnight room capacity. “We’re not adding any rooms,” Marrero told the board, noting that cabana/day‑use operations would be governed by the hotel’s operational rules and that the team planned additional renderings and traffic/operational details for a follow‑up meeting.
Board reaction and next steps: Several board members said renderings showing the view from the beach and the boardwalk were insufficient and asked the applicant to produce clear, scaled elevations and a more detailed explanation of operations (including day‑use controls and peak‑day limits). The board suggested additional neighborhood outreach and technical studies; staff recommended continuation to allow the applicant time for revisions. The board set the item for the Jan. 13, 2026 meeting.
What to watch: The applicant committed to working with staff and neighbors; the board flagged compatibility, pedestrian experience along the boardwalk, view corridors and several overlay variances as the key issues it expects to see addressed before any approval.
