Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners raise privacy, scale and maintenance concerns in side-yard/ADU code review
Summary
A commissioner presented proposed changes to side-yard setback rules and suggested stepped-back upper stories and minimum side setbacks to reduce overcrowding, maintenance conflicts and visual scale; commissioners requested staff materials and agreed to discuss further in December.
Commissioner Maddie introduced a proposed revision to the city's residential side-yard standards and offered a starter text for commission discussion. Her memo, provided to commissioners in advance and circulated again at the meeting, suggested increasing the minimum side-yard balance to 7.5 feet on each side (instead of a 15-foot combined total with a 5-foot minimum on one side), limiting the run of a structure along a property line to 25 feet and requiring upper-story stepbacks where a side-yard dimension is as narrow as 7.5 feet.
"I think our current side yard code requirements really risk overcrowding and loss of privacy," Maddie said, adding that maintenance and construction conflicts can arise when structures sit within 5 feet of a property line and that taller, unbroken building facades can create incompatible scale.
Commissioners asked staff to provide the correct version of the memo (one scanned PDF contained an older pagination error) and to include the side-yard item in December packet materials. Several commissioners said they liked the level of specificity in Maddie’s draft and supported taking a deeper look, while staff reiterated the importance of proceeding with a full commission quorum and transparent process.
Commissioners also discussed how side-yard rules intersect with accessory dwelling unit (ADU) rules, noting that past ADU policy assumed those units were not separately sellable; commissioners flagged that change in market practices could require coordinated updates to ADU and subdivision rules.
Staff said they would consolidate the correct documents, include the side-yard discussion in the December agenda materials and identify which components could be advanced as discrete code amendments or considered as part of the 2026 development-code work plan.
