Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Policy Adoption topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Policy committee advances medication policy change and proposed religious‑based exemption to December board

Union County Public Schools Policy Committee · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee moved policies updating epinephrine terminology and a proposed religious‑based exemptions policy to the full Union County Public Schools board for its December meeting after attorney Morris said the changes reflect recent statutory requirements (Session Law 2025-84).

The Union County Public Schools policy committee voted to forward several policies to the full board for action at the December meeting, including revisions that change how epinephrine is referenced and a proposed new religious‑based exemptions policy.

Attorney Morris told the committee that revisions to policy 3-19 (administration of medication/first aid) and policy 4-06 (administration of medicines) are limited to replacing the statutory term "auto‑injector" with "delivery system" to reflect a change in statute concerning epinephrine. "The revisions to these policies are due to recent statutory changes," Morris said, adding that there had been no stakeholder feedback since prior committee and board reviews.

Morris also introduced a proposed new policy to address religious objections required by Session Law 2025-84 and recommended the committee forward that policy to the board. "This policy is recommended to address the religious objection requirement from Session Law 2025-84," Morris said.

An unidentified committee member moved to send the three items (policies 3-19 and 4-06, plus the proposed religious‑based exemptions policy) to the full board; after a second, the committee approved the motion by voice vote.

The committee packet and Morris's presentation did not report stakeholder feedback on the religious‑based exemption, and staff asked the board to consider the items at its December meeting.

Next steps: the items will appear on the December board agenda for formal action and any public comment at that meeting.