Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Outside Counsel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners table decision on outside legal counsel for tax-abatement reviews; request expanded scope
Summary
Faced with public concern about Chapter 381 economic-development agreements, the court introduced a proposed engagement with Bracewell LLP, then voted unanimously to table hiring until Nov. 12 while asking the judge to confirm the scope includes Chapter 312 and policy drafting with citizen input.
The Hood County Commissioners Court discussed whether to retain outside counsel to review and negotiate economic-development agreements under Chapter 381 of the Local Government Code and to help draft a county policy on tax‑abatements and incentive agreements.
Judge Massengill told the court he had received an engagement letter from Bracewell LLP (Blakely Fernandez) that would review project proposals, prepare outreach and notice language, and—if the county proceeded—require the developer to pay certain fees to the county for counsel services. The judge said the firm’s practice is to do preliminary review at no cost and seek developer-paid engagement agreements for further work.
Multiple speakers — including Jessica Hall, Greg Harrell and other residents who had toured a large Taylor County project — urged the court to require more protections, public hearings and stricter limits on agreement length, transparency and enforcement. Harrell and others described the Taylor County ‘Stargate’ project as an example of perceived “bait‑and‑switch” development where initial representations to the county differed from later construction and operations.
Commissioner Eagle said the agenda item encompassed two things: (1) the immediate agreement on the table and (2) a broader request to develop a refreshed county policy on Chapter 381 agreements (the court acknowledged an outdated 2018 policy). The commissioners discussed adding Chapter 312 language to the counsel scope to ensure the firm could advise on both 381 and 312 agreement options.
Outcome: Commissioner Eagle moved to table Item 3 until the Nov. 12 commissioners court so the judge could follow up with the proposed counsel about including Chapter 312 in the engagement letter and returning with draft policy guidance and citizen-engagement proposals. The motion was seconded and carried unanimously. Commissioners said they will solicit written scope adjustments from counsel and hold additional workshops before acting.
What’s next: The court expects to receive confirmation of the engagement scope (including Chapter 312), proposed policy drafts and options for a workshop or public review ahead of the November 12 meeting.
