Council defers decision on Palace nursing-home expansion after parking and traffic concerns

Homestead City Council · November 20, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Palace—s request to add a 240-bed skilled nursing facility at 3100 Campbell Drive was deferred so the applicant can complete a fuller traffic study and address parking and right-of-way improvements the city may require. Applicant proffered to build necessary improvements if feasible; council asked for right-turn/deceleration-lane analysis.

The Homestead City Council on Nov. 19 deferred action on three items for The Palace—s proposed Phase 2 expansion at 3100 Campbell Drive — a site-plan amendment, variances for roof-parapet height and parking, and a special exception to permit a 240-bed skilled-nursing facility.

The project team described a two-phase campus across roughly 10 acres: an existing 201-unit assisted-living facility (Phase 1) and a proposed 240-bed skilled-nursing building (Phase 2). Staff recommended approval of the consolidated application subject to conditions including compliance with submitted plans, a hydraulic analysis (with applicant-funded improvements if required), lighting and landscaping requirements, and a traffic analysis. The applicant proffered to provide any needed right-of-way improvements that are physically feasible, including an eastbound deceleration/right-only lane on Campbell Drive.

Councilmembers focused on the parking variance and whether prior parking counts and the old code—s assisted-living standard (1 space per 3 residents plus employees) should apply rather than the current commercial standard that yields a much higher parking requirement. Councilman Roth and others asked whether taking a large portion of the rear parcel for occasional event overflow parking would unduly limit future uses. Several members also pressed that a complete, verifiable traffic study is needed before action on variances and site plan.

The applicant and planning staff agreed to complete a more comprehensive traffic analysis to identify right-of-way impacts and any required improvements. Council voted to defer the related agenda items and set a possible December hearing date (December 17) if the traffic study and staff review could be completed in time; otherwise the matter would return in January. Staff noted the draft site plan and variance requests will remain subject to the conditions proffered during the presentation.

What—s next: The applicant will commission updated traffic counts/analysis and provide engineering details about feasibility of a deceleration lane and access management; staff will update the resolution to include required improvements and return the item to council after review.