Auditors fault USDB governance and oversight; State Board says it is acting to improve data and management
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
The legislative audit found long‑running governance and financial oversight weaknesses at the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind, recommended clearer governance structure and academic monitoring, and USBE said it has begun implementing internal changes and a database to improve reporting.
Legislative auditors told the Legislative Audit Subcommittee that repeated financial and management problems at the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind (USDB) reflect insufficient attention by the State Board of Education and inadequate governance structures. Jake (audit lead) traced issues back decades, noting a landmark legislative audit in 2004 had identified problems going back to 1993 and that recent problems in 2023 prompted legislative and State Board intervention.
The auditors recommended changes to governance and oversight to ensure proper expertise and time commitment to USDB, and they urged stronger monitoring of academic outcomes. "The State Board of Education has not given adequate time or attention to USDB governance, and this insufficient oversight has allowed repeated financial problems as well as management problems," the audit read. Auditors highlighted that many administrative policies for direct USDB activities were approved by management rather than the State Board (auditors reported 66% approved without board approval in their review).
The audit also recommended implementing an "educational benefit review" — a monitoring process to track individual student growth over time within the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act framework — to improve academic focus. Auditors noted USDB campus students perform substantially below peers without disabilities in state testing (auditors cited campus proficiency consistently under 15% on state standardized tests).
USBE and USDB leadership responded: Leanne Wood (vice chair, Utah State Board of Education) and Darren Nielsen (assistant superintendent assigned to USDB) said USBE and the board have already taken steps, including creating a standing USDB committee, appointing non‑voting advisory members, convening targeted groups for building and capital needs, and enacting HB 537 to place some financial operations under USBE. Nielsen said USDB has moved to improve data collection and intends to deploy a database for outreach service tracking before the end of the school year. He provided updated counts (as of October): about 370 campus K–12 students, 1,183 students receiving outreach services statewide, and 535 in the parent‑infant program.
Nielsen also emphasized that auditors did not identify findings that called into question the quality of classroom instruction: "There were no recommendations or findings that followed around the quality of the services that the educators in the schools for the deaf and blind are providing to students across the state," he told the committee.
Several legislators urged that any governance changes preserve parent and student voices and avoid cutting services; they asked the board to present clear, statutory recommendations about titles and points of accountability so the legislature and families know who is responsible. A committee member moved to refer the USDB performance audit to the Public Education Appropriations Subcommittee; the transcript records the motion but does not record a vote before the excerpt ends.
