Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Commission denies after-the-fact shoreline stabilization at 281 East Avenue, seeks peer review or remediation

November 20, 2025 | Norwalk City, Fairfield, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission denies after-the-fact shoreline stabilization at 281 East Avenue, seeks peer review or remediation
The Planning & Zoning Commission voted to deny a coastal site plan application to retain riprap slope stabilization and a two‑foot fill placed at 281 East Avenue without prior approvals.

Engineer Tessa Utrayta and other project representatives presented photographs and engineering cross sections showing steep existing slopes and damaged piles; they argued the riprap was necessary and unavoidable to protect a pre‑1995 structure and to stabilize slopes disturbed during construction of an approved addition. Staff and DEEP reviewers said riprap stabilization can be permitted when three criteria are met: it is necessary, it protects a qualifying structure, and no less‑damaging feasible alternative exists.

Commissioners and neighbors questioned why the change was not identified or permitted during the original 2024 coastal site plan review, whether vegetative stabilization or gabion alternatives could have been used, and whether the contractor or project manager should have notified the city when construction methods changed. Several commissioners said they were reluctant to approve a post‑construction shoreline modification without independent technical review.

After deliberation the commission voted to deny the request but clarified denial would be recorded without prejudice and noted the applicant could return with a peer review from an outside engineer or a revised plan demonstrating feasible, permitted alternatives or mitigation. Staff said denial could require removal of the unauthorized work if no acceptable remedy is presented; commissioners asked staff to work with the applicant and to return the matter after a peer review or resubmittal.

The commission also added conditions requiring landscape mitigation and restoration where feasible, and recommended the applicant coordinate any further proposals with DEEP and city staff.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Connecticut articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI