Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Troy staff present options to fix 30-year-old police station; councilors debate bullet-resistant windows and phasing

November 20, 2025 | Troy, Miami County, Ohio


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Troy staff present options to fix 30-year-old police station; councilors debate bullet-resistant windows and phasing
Staff presented the police-facility study and said the building — about 30 years old — has extensive deferred maintenance, naming windows, roof, basement and locker-room space as priorities. "We're looking at a, about a $5,000,000 price tag to renovate that building," Speaker 2 said, summarizing the consultant's scope for a full renovation while noting staff are developing phased options.

Conference participants discussed phasing and safety trade-offs. Speaker 2 proposed a $1,000,000 first-year allocation to replace first-floor windows and specified that 14 of the roughly 51 total windows would be bullet-resistant, with upper-floor windows receiving higher-grade (shatter- or impact-resistant) glazing. "1000000 dollars would yes. We cover it with replace all of the windows...the bottom ones would be bullet resistant," Speaker 2 said.

Council members asked whether blocking or bricking off some windows could reduce costs: one participant noted blocking a small number of windows could be "one tenth the cost" of larger renovations (approximately $23,000 for bricking off some windows was cited in the discussion). Another council member said the probability of a shooting into the building is "very small" and urged balancing cost against risk, while others stressed officer safety and downtown presence as factors favoring investment.

Staff laid out alternatives — two-year versus three-year phasing — and quantified the premium of spreading work out. Speaker 2 said doing the work over three years might add approximately $500,000–$600,000 in remobilization and inflation costs compared with a two-year approach, but could ease annual budget pressure. Staff committed to providing detailed design numbers and recommended bringing a full project authorization back to council if members approve the placeholder funding.

Where it stands: no formal vote occurred at the workshop. Staff will provide a detailed report and cost breakdown for council consideration; planning-permit or planning-commission review may be required for exterior changes such as bricking windows.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Ohio articles free in 2025

https://workplace-ai.com/
https://workplace-ai.com/