County commissioners engaged in a prolonged and contentious discussion about the proposed 2026 budget, personnel decisions, contingency use, and a $7 million capital balance held from the sale of a county nursing home.

Several commissioners criticized prior budgeting and hiring practices while others defended the county’s finance staff and a contingency approach intended to allow targeted responses to emergent needs. Speakers debated whether vacant budgeted positions had been left unfilled inappropriately, whether the county should use the interest from a $7 million capital fund for short‑term operational needs, and whether the board had a clear multi‑year recovery plan for the general fund.

Commissioners referenced earlier projections and progress: one presenter characterized the general‑fund shortfall that arrived with the board as roughly $20 million and said recent work reduced that to an estimated $6 million. Commissioners disagreed sharply over strategy, with some urging a three‑year recovery plan and others warning against using capital proceeds to patch operating shortfalls.

The board ultimately moved to "lay the 2026 budget on view" for public inspection — a procedural step to put the draft budget on public display — and the motion passed on a voice vote after an aye/no exchange in which at least one 'No' was recorded. No final adoption or tax increase was enacted at the meeting; the matter remains subject to further deliberation and formal votes as the budget process continues.

Commissioner Fauci told the board she had not received suggested budget materials that had been circulated and asked that colleagues coordinate; commissioners agreed to continue review and discussion and to provide requested supplemental information before final adoption.