Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Panel debates INMP reporting templates, audits and regional flexibility for calculating R
Summary
Panelists reviewed summary tables used by coalitions, debated how much field‑level detail growers should report versus coalition calculation of removal (R), and recommended phased QA/QC and regional flexibility; Central Coast speakers urged caution about coalition capabilities and public parcel‑level disclosure.
Panelists spent a substantial portion of the Nov. 19 meeting discussing the INMP summary tables and who should calculate the removal component (R) used in A−R reporting.
Daniel Geisler displayed the East San Joaquin coalition summary tables that list parcel IDs, crop, acres, irrigation method and other field inputs used to compute A−R. He explained that growers typically report yields and applied nitrogen, while coalitions apply R coefficients to reported yields and, for perennials, add sequestered nitrogen values.
Ali Montazar…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
