Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Panel flags INMP summary tables, auditing and coalition roles as key implementation challenges
Summary
Panelists reviewed INMP summary tables and reporting templates and raised implementation questions about multi-crop fields, soil data, coalition vs. grower calculation of R, and the need for staged QA/QC rather than immediate, heavy auditing.
Panelists spent substantial time on Question 5 discussing what growers report in INMP summary tables, who calculates R (nitrogen removed), and how auditing should be handled.
Daniel Geisler and Ali Montazar reviewed example summary tables used by an East San Joaquin Valley coalition and noted the extensive per-field data being requested (irrigation methods, irrigation efficiency practices, applied nitrogen, yields, crop age,…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
