Owners of 235 West 1st Avenue presented a request to replace multiple historic windows they said were structurally compromised. The applicants argued that repeated, systemic moisture intrusion caused by older storm windows and failing sills made full-frame replacements the practical remedy. "Replacement addresses the cause, not just the symptoms," an applicant said when urging a full replacement.

HPO staff and commissioners countered that most sash and frame components remained repairable and cited the commission's 50% guideline for replacement eligibility. Staff recommended targeted sill replacement, repair of mortise-and-tenon joints, and installation of new, operable storm or triple-track systems with weep holes to prevent further deterioration.

Given the unresolved technical questions and the owner's concerns about cost and insurance timelines, the commission voted to continue the application to a later hearing. Staff advised immediate interim steps (new operable storm windows and temporary weatherproofing) and explained the appeal path and financial-hardship procedures should the owner seek them after a denial.

Next steps: Applicants to obtain repair and replacement estimates, consider new operable storm windows as an interim protective measure, and return with additional documentation. Staff will provide guidance on appeal procedures and documentation required for any financial-hardship claim.