Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Commission splits West Poplar application; doors and two nonhistoric windows approved amid debate over historic window replacements

November 21, 2025 | Columbus City Committees (Special Meetings), Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission splits West Poplar application; doors and two nonhistoric windows approved amid debate over historic window replacements
The Victorian Village Commission heard an extended and contested presentation for COA 250806, an application affecting windows and doors at a multi-story house on West Poplar Street. Owner Brett Long argued the house needs wholesale window replacement, citing insurance timelines and the long-delayed state of repair. "I would like approval of the replacement of all the windows," Brett Long said during public remarks.

HPO staff said they had conducted site visits and concluded most of the historic wood windows were repairable with targeted sill and sash work and weatherproofing; staff recommended repair in place when less than 50% of a window's material is deteriorated. Commissioners reiterated that retention of historic fabric is the commission's primary charge and discussed the option to split the application rather than grant a blanket replacement.

The commission split the application into B‑1 (side/back doors and the two nonhistoric windows identified in staff's site visit) and B‑2 (the remaining historic windows). The panel approved B‑1 with conditions that transoms remain or be repaired in place and that final product details be submitted to staff. Commissioners debated B‑2 at length — emphasizing the 50% threshold in the preservation standards — but the commission ultimately recorded a vote on the B‑2 motion following discussion.

The discussion included alternatives for appeal and financial-hardship procedures should the owner later seek a waiver; staff advised the applicant that denial decisions can be appealed and that a financial-hardship appeal requires documentation under city code.

Next steps: HPO staff will work with the applicant to identify precisely which window units are covered by each approved piece of the motion and to document any appeal paths or further submittals for the items the commission did not approve without conditions.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Ohio articles free in 2025

https://workplace-ai.com/
https://workplace-ai.com/