Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Council moves to advance Mobility Implementation Plan update adding pedestrian and intersection bicycle metrics

November 19, 2025 | Bellevue, King County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council moves to advance Mobility Implementation Plan update adding pedestrian and intersection bicycle metrics
Bellevue City Council on Nov. 18 directed staff to prepare a resolution to adopt the 2025 update to the Mobility Implementation Plan (MIP), a planning document that identifies performance metrics, network gaps and project concepts used to prioritize projects for the Transportation Facilities Plan and the capital improvement program.

Transportation staff and Transportation Commission members presented the recommendation and the rationale for the update. Key changes in the draft MIP include adding a pedestrian level‑of‑traffic‑stress (PLTS) metric that accounts for speed, traffic volume, buffer and sidewalk width; refining the bicycle level‑of‑traffic‑stress (BLTS) metric to explicitly address intersections; refreshing older data to align with the comprehensive plan horizon and extending the forecast from 2035 to 2044.

Staff emphasized the MIP provides performance targets and project concepts rather than prescriptive, retroactive requirements. For example, the PLTS approach uses a conservative 'speed factor' of approximately 1.2× the posted speed when corridor speed data are unavailable; meeting PLTS targets applies to future frontage design and does not force existing developments to retrofit. The commission recommended project scoring based on council goals (safety, equity, connectivity, and land‑use support) with supplemental points for factors like presence on Vision Zero high‑injury corridors.

Council members pressed staff on how the MIP interacts with land‑use code standards, developer expectations, and whether alternate parallel corridors should be identified when arterials cannot meet all‑ages-and‑abilities targets. Staff said the MIP will inform the transportation facilities plan (which applies fiscal constraints) and that a proposed transportation master plan could later provide more prescriptive cross‑section guidance.

After extended discussion on metrics, prioritization and coordination across commissions, the council moved to have staff prepare a resolution adopting the MIP 2025 update for consideration at a future meeting; the motion passed by voice vote.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI