Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Dig Alert and USA North report ticketing and GIS improvements, urge better member data to reduce late EPRs

November 20, 2025 | Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety, Other State Agencies, Executive, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Dig Alert and USA North report ticketing and GIS improvements, urge better member data to reduce late EPRs
Representatives from USA North and Dig Alert briefed the board on operational and technology changes intended to improve ticket quality and speed operator responses.

USA North explained how the introduction of automated ‘no response’ messages earlier in the year temporarily inflated delivery counts and prompted an outreach effort to update member contact data. Presenter James Wingate described investments in base maps and supplemental layers — address points, preliminary parcels, mile markers and API links to county GIS — designed to help excavators draw precise dig polygons and reduce over‑notification. Wingate said the industry must aim to give locators the best available context: ‘‘we’d rather have utility operators complain that they received too many tickets than not enough,’’ he told the board, arguing the system should err on caution while improving precision.

Dig Alert reported adding a GIS specialist, expanding member services hours, refining auto no‑responses to target only members who failed to submit EPRs, and creating investigator tools to visualize overlapping areas of notification for troubleshooting. Dig Alert also described redundancy improvements for critical servers and an outreach push including updated instructional videos and a recent mock‑strike safety summit that staged a live fire demonstration to show consequences when lines are struck.

During Q&A members and public speakers raised recurring operational questions: how call center agents handle 'no response' and remark requests, whether they cross‑check prior revisions before issuing a revision‑1 no‑response, and the limits of emergency‑ticket handling. Call center staff acknowledged imperfect processes but emphasized ongoing technical fixes, data hygiene and training to reduce errors and false negatives.

Both centers asked for continued collaboration with the board and operators as SB 254 rulemaking moves forward, given the planned expansion of early planning and design exchanges.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal